A severance proposal deserves its own review when a nanny job ends. Before deciding what to do with it, identify the payments described, the conditions attached and the dates that require attention. Keep the proposal separate from the practical conversation about your last shift or returning household property.

This guide helps organize documents and questions for qualified review. It does not tell you whether to sign, determine what you are owed or assess whether a release or other provision is enforceable. The complete agreement and the relevant circumstances matter.

Identify the proposal you actually received

Save the complete document and the message that delivered it. Record the date received, the named parties, the version and any attachments it refers to. If pages or referenced terms are missing, request them rather than assuming they are standard.

The U.S. Department of Labor states that the Fair Labor Standards Act does not require severance pay. That limited federal point does not resolve obligations under an agreement or other applicable law in your situation.

Read the document's description of the proposed payment carefully. Is there a separate severance figure, or one total combining several items? If the message and attachment describe different amounts or dates, note the discrepancy without deciding which controls. Ask for a clear, complete explanation and take consequential questions to an appropriately qualified adviser.

Separate the amounts before comparing the total

Make an original payment map with one line per item. Use the document's own labels and retain a question mark where the description is unclear.

  • Final work payment: Which work period does the proposal say this covers?
  • Expenses or other outstanding items: Are they listed separately, included in a total or not addressed?
  • Proposed severance: What amount or method does the document describe?
  • Payment timing: What date or event is said to trigger each payment?
  • Unresolved difference: What does not match your existing records or understanding?

These headings organize questions; they do not decide the legal character of an amount. Do not relabel a payment because a different term seems more favorable, and do not assume a single transfer explains every outstanding item.

Ask for the breakdown needed to compare the proposal with your own employment records. You can identify a missing period or unexplained total without calculating a legal entitlement. If the response raises a dispute about what is owed, preserve the facts for qualified advice.

Locate conditions and dates without interpreting them yourself

Read beyond the payment paragraph. Flag references to signing, releases, confidentiality, future statements, returning records or other commitments. Note where a condition appears and which payment or obligation it seems to concern. Ask an adviser to explain its actual effect rather than relying on the heading.

Make a separate date strip: date received, stated response date, proposed employment-end date and any payment dates or events named. These may serve different purposes. Copy them accurately and identify any conflict between the covering message and the document.

If you need time or missing information for review, ask promptly. A request for more time does not itself change a deadline. Confirm any response in writing and seek timely advice about an approaching date instead of assuming a general online rule applies.

Do not treat a recruiter or employer's practical explanation as independent legal review of a provision that affects your rights or decisions.

Work through an undivided payment proposal

Fictional example: Nanny Noor receives a separation proposal describing one “departure payment.” The covering email says the amount includes the last work period and an additional payment. The attachment gives only the total and links payment to signing the document.

Noor makes two factual questions visible: what amounts are assigned to the final work period and the proposed additional payment, and what the document says about their timing. Noor asks for a written breakdown rather than treating the entire total as severance.

A second issue appears in the dates. The email asks for a response on Thursday, while the attachment names Friday. Noor asks which response date the sender intends and sends the complete material to a qualified adviser for review, making the date conflict prominent.

Noor does not assume that identifying the mismatch cancels either date. Nor does Noor decide from this example whether the conditions are valid. The practical result is a complete packet and specific questions that an adviser can address.

Prepare a focused review request and preserve the answer

Send the adviser the full proposal, relevant employment agreement, covering messages and a short factual chronology through their designated private channel. Ask what additional records they need; do not include children's private material merely to make the packet look comprehensive.

Lead with the decisions you need help understanding: the payment breakdown, the effect of conditions, the relevant dates and any disagreement with existing records. Tell the adviser which dates are approaching. Distinguish your factual notes from conclusions you want them to assess.

After clarification or revision, identify which version the response concerns. Compare the revised proposal with your outstanding questions and return new or unanswered issues for review. Keep the actual decision separate from receipt, discussion or a request for edits. A clear record should show what you received, what you asked and what you ultimately chose, without claiming that this checklist supplied the legal answer.

Sources

U.S. Department of Labor: Severance Pay, checked October 27, 2026. Federal orientation only. The payment map, date strip and fictional example are original NAJ tools, not legal advice about a particular agreement.